Re: Extending avadhAnam to other Indian languages
Sastry Isukapalli (ssi@eohsi.rutgers.edu)
Thu, 12 Sep 1996 18:46:05 -0400
>
>I also feel that we should have only SatavadhAnams from him as
>
> 1. It gives a sense of participation to more people
>
> 2. He doesn't seem to get challenged enough by ashTAvadhAnams
I remember reading somewhere in some text book (in the context of tirupati
venkata kavulu) that ashTAadhAnam is more difficult than SatAvadhAnam.
Obviously it looks like SatAvadhAnam is tougher. Any one cares to explain
to me?
Thanks,
Sastry (One miserable ignoramus who has missed the SatAvadhAnam).