Re: on the NJ/NY SatAvadhAnam

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: PRASAD@KP26: "Re: Nighantuvu"
• Previous message: Rao Veluri: "Re[2]: on the NJ/NY SatAvadhAnam"
• In reply to: Nyayapathi Srinivasa Rao: "Re: on the NJ/NY SatAvadhAnam"
• Next in thread: D. Sreenivasa Rao: "Re: on the NJ/NY SatAvadhAnam"
• Reply: D. Sreenivasa Rao: "Re: on the NJ/NY SatAvadhAnam"

After a personal email by Ramakrishna Pillalmarri gaaru, who 
immediately spotted mistakes in the poem. 

 > vividhOttunga taranga sanghaTTana chaladvEla vanai lAvalI
   vividhOttunga taranga    ghaTTana chaladvElA vanai lAvalI
                   
 > 'lavalI lunga lavanga' sangata latA lAsyambu leekshinchuchun
 > dhavalAkshul sani kAnchiranta       natteera dEshambunan
   dhavalAkshul sani kAnchiranta ***** datteera dEshambunan

 > avadAtambuja phEna punja nibhunayyashvOttamun davvulan
   avadAtAmbuja phEna punja nibhunayyashvOttamun davvulan


I can' recollect the **** part. I'll refer to my copy of mahA bhAratam
from home and post it later. But knowing that our telusa group
consists of experts on lit, I wouldn't be suprprised if somebody
fills it up tomorrow. Or if you want to get a kick, you might 
want to fill it in with your own word and see how you compare to 
Nannaya.

Ramana

• Next message: PRASAD@KP26: "Re: Nighantuvu"
• Previous message: Rao Veluri: "Re[2]: on the NJ/NY SatAvadhAnam"
• In reply to: Nyayapathi Srinivasa Rao: "Re: on the NJ/NY SatAvadhAnam"
• Next in thread: D. Sreenivasa Rao: "Re: on the NJ/NY SatAvadhAnam"
• Reply: D. Sreenivasa Rao: "Re: on the NJ/NY SatAvadhAnam"