Re: Re's: Transformation/mis-representation of epic symbols in

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Ramabhadra Dokka: "Re(2): Re's: SrI bApA rAo and SrI PALANA gArla comments on pancama vEdam"
• Previous message: prasad: "Re: Baparao Replies on pancama vEdaM"

On Tue, 29 Oct 1996, sdokka@st6000.sct.edu (Ramabhadra Dokka) wrote:
>Chandrasekhararao Kanneganti wrote :

>I am not questioning his point, but I am saying that he took an inappropriate 
>symbol to represent this. 

(Rest of a long post deleted)

I was quite moved by Satish Chander's poem.

I had a rather detailed rebuttal of Sree Dokka's arguments in the works.  But 
after reading Sree Veluri's re-post of Sree Bapa Rao's comments, it is clear to 
me that one could hardly improve on what Sree Bapa Rao has already said so 
elegantly.

I am sure that just as every elder who repeated the mahaabhaarata story pointed 
to Ekalavya as the ideal of studentship, every, I repeat every youngster, who 
heard it felt a great sense of injustice and cried out "unfair!"  Why is this 
innate sense of idealism lost as one "matures?"

Regards,

paaNini

• Next message: Ramabhadra Dokka: "Re(2): Re's: SrI bApA rAo and SrI PALANA gArla comments on pancama vEdam"
• Previous message: prasad: "Re: Baparao Replies on pancama vEdaM"