Re: neo-laakshaNika grandha

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Sahithi P.S.: "jaavaLeelu"
• Previous message: Prabhakar Vissavajjhala: "nAlO nEnu (Is literature the ultimate? #6)"
• In reply to: Ramakrishna S. Pillalamarri: "Re: neo-laakshaNika grandha"

On Mon, 16 Jun 1997, Ramakrishna S. Pillalamarri wrote:


> At 14:22 6/5/97, V. Chowdary Jampala wrote:
> 
> While they may, that is an adhoc compilation at best. I am not sure
> SreeSree himself set about to "define" the new lakshaNas in these poems. In

	I am sure that he did. I read his own writings and arudra's
writings testifying to that effect.

> 
> >Those that want to adhere to danDin are welcome to do so.
> 
> It is all too clear that the new rules wouldn't welcome poetry of danDin's
> taste. I wonder how JVC happened to pick him, out of the dead poet society.

	I thought that of all people raamakRUshNa would figure out  gaaru
 why I picked  danDin. It is not for his taste, pada_laalitya or
bhaava_laalitya. Not too long ago, in an effort to tell us why SreeSree is
not a mahaa_kavi, somebody quoted danDin's lakshaNa SaaStra at length. As
I said earlier, if danDin continues to be somebody's standard, so be it.
It is not mine.

        Regards 		---- V. Chowdary Jampala

• Next message: Sahithi P.S.: "jaavaLeelu"
• Previous message: Prabhakar Vissavajjhala: "nAlO nEnu (Is literature the ultimate? #6)"
• In reply to: Ramakrishna S. Pillalamarri: "Re: neo-laakshaNika grandha"