> This was Kanneganti Rama Rao gari opinion also. I wonder if they meant it
>
[Lines Deleted]
I strongly disagree with most of your message. Ari Sitaramayya gaaru already
said, what I was going to ask also. So, I just have one more question to add.
> One reason for their thinking must be their belief in poetry as a social
> instrument. It follows naturally that they should demand 'clarity, total
> communication' through all poetry. I maintain that poetry can be an
> instrument for change, but the poet does not conciously intend it to be.
> The moment (s)he assumes this illusion, his poetry looses its magic.
-------------
Agreed that the poet(ess) may not conciously intend it. But, why is it an
"illusion"?
Regards,
Sreenivas