Re: nalupu or telupu? my turn!

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Nyayapathi Srinivasa Rao: "Vide aadiparvam.draupadee_swayamvaram"
• Previous message: Ramana Juvvadi: "Re [Nannaya says Arjuna was 'asita']"
• In reply to: Rao Veluri: "nalupu or telupu? my turn!"

Sree vaeloori says:

>      Having read the enlightening discussions on nalupu - telupu,
>      I was tempted to shut up and not betray my ignorance, in public.
>      But, the gene responsible for the 'kukka buddhi' didn't let
>      me do it! So, audaciously I admit that I am entering the fray,
>      though late, 'non-reluctantly.' 
>      
>      The Andhra Mahabharata was referred; Nannaya & Tikkana were quoted.
>      But, is that our ultimate standard? No siree! For us Indians, hailing 
>      from the punya bhoomi, the last words must come only from the Vedas.

It was i that quoted Nannaya. I did it as a reply to Sree ramaNa's post.
I was not my fault if that happened to be one in an 8*8 messageful thread!
I did not say anything in black&white terms on either side! 
Neither did i conclude by implication that 'asita' is acceptable 
since it was sanctioned by Nannaya.
Maybe i picked a silly nit! No more! No less!
Maybe becasue i'm not capable of talking about more important issues!

[The rest deleted]

I am wondering why guruvu gaaru is so much angry with the rest of us!
Or was it anguish? OK. In either case,
guruvu gaaroo, i cannot talk about vaedaas for an excellent reason that
don't understand them!

pardonnez-moi mon ignorance!

--

Regards & Thanks
Vasu.

• Next message: Nyayapathi Srinivasa Rao: "Vide aadiparvam.draupadee_swayamvaram"
• Previous message: Ramana Juvvadi: "Re [Nannaya says Arjuna was 'asita']"
• In reply to: Rao Veluri: "nalupu or telupu? my turn!"