GIF87asssppp///%%%TTTLLLƋjjBBB```г,D`#dislp,tmx|pH,Ҁ\T7v ,I;rVj5ɿ/K|NT}]ooMS.^dqXpac"q`fhY-lV\h&{tMO8RP-MӼR HAxVDpg=$!|đG#Ȗ5 R;sfŜwYH*]ʴN? S8JիX5t@ИJիѢC}zɳٵ-Dz혒kȹ:KBֿ La|>ǐ#KL˘3k̹ϠC[~`@ӨS#״5B7siWChJqmPp8d㏍#yʟK.=uسktO1鰼̏,"5Ab?? j(`wZs6j`$ɅSoeH7]PA(Wq1B(4hݼ(<@9BiH&mFPF)T&Uf\vYkx |<}D9aOEIpdKՊ$bJEQmiWb&ʤX*:%F*WNʍ|@h͖[thf]'ՉNG(eede꒞ޕ)Z,MV^1FEf_J:H k&+Aګҋ,l'0;GpJlgwqT3wy#WYҀ/g/5{s<ϻs@\G=A tJ3MpOOLR'L+mbstcO-phpmp ,2 mzwz "start" --> On Tue, 23 Jul 1996 krishna@ihcmail.ih.lucent.com wrote:

> > Chandhobhadha kavitvam is not "cool" or "topical" but I believe that
> there is a silent majority who enjoy reading them.

Let me split off the 'classics' from the current chandObaddha
poetry as I did in my earlier post. I am skeptical that there is a silent
'majority' who enjoys reading the latter. In my view of the world, the only
present day poetry enjoyed by a majority of people is film lyrics
(gaddar's songs may come a close second). Among those that read -and write-
current non-filmi poetry (a minority by themselves), it is my impression
(certainly open to debate) that the traditional metric poetry comes
second to the non-traditional poetry.

Going by the discussions in this forum, those that enjoy
chandObaddha kavitvam aren't 'silent' either :)

Regards --- V. Chowdary Jampala