>
> jemGij Ka'n, ta'marlEnoo,
> na'dirsha', Gajnii, GOrii,
> sikidarO evaDaitEnEm?
> okokkaDoo maha'hamtakuDu. <*******************
>
> No need to say who was the greatest murderer from the list Sri Sri =
had
> provided with. In the name of history, these saitans killed several =
millions
> of innocent individuals. Their names are glorified in the history =
books.
> Do they see it now? Do they enjoy their victories now? Their victor=
ies
> brought the decline of several cultures and elimination of several =
societies
> from the roots. Does history talk about that tragedy?
>
Dear Sir! Sorry for talking about SriSri.
This poem as an Emotional Analysis is okay. Excuse me! Do I have
to freedom to question how far this analysis is true?
I wish I had ask the question "Does history talk about *that* tragedy?". =
SriSri has created history at his own level. He made his era by writing =
"Revolutionary poetry". How is revolution possible! by fighting only!
I mean "balavantulu dharAdhipatulai balaheenula peeDiMcuku tinnappuDu,
balaheenulu eduru tiragaDaM..... viplavaMEgadA!...." there he is
talking of bloodshed!
This poem is against to marxist philosophy. The *fight* is inevitable.
You vote for it or not, it happens... somehow or other.
"gatamaMtA taDise raktamuna kAkuMTE kanneeLlulatO!". Ofcourse, it has
to be... animal system is like that. What is so great in telling this?
> amta' tama prayOjakatvam,
> ta'mE Buvi kadhina'dhulamani,
> stha'pimcina sa'mra'jya'loo,
> nirmimcina krutrima caTTa'l--- <*****************
>
> Now the laws come into picture. Who is the law-maker? The most bril=
liant
> history-maker is the law maker. The history-maker is the most intell=
igent and
> he is destined to rule the world. Hence, the responsibility of law-m=
aking is
> in his hands. What a lie is this! What an illusion is this! Which=
historian
> cares for the opinions of the common man wile these laws were made =
and
> implemented?
Law is always made by the people, for the people, to the people. There =
was
no oneman law or there will be in future. I accept that few emperors were=
there that time too, who did not care for common man's opinion.
We all know Saddam Hussain, inspite of all US's efforts he
is still continuing those gory acts.
There were extreme people in the history and they are now also! BUT,
I wanted to convey that History is not just that. SriSri has just
tried to ignite emotional anger in common people, he succeeded. I wish
he should have told about King Ashoka who has turned as a boudha. SriSri
must have spoken about King Bhoja who is in our history.
Rama was there when RavaNa was there! kaMsa was there when Krishna was
there. If someone tries to tell that history consists *only* rAvaNa and
kaMsa it is not acceptible.
>But, the common man afterall voted for this law-maker or served
> the ruler in the past. The ruler is in the history books. What a =
great
> justice!
>
There are MLAs in our Assembly who represent the people in their
assembly consistuency. You mean to say everyone should be named
in the Assembly :). NO SIR! I think this is not possible.
caritra aTuvaMTidi ani nA abhiprAyaM. manaM cEyagaligiMdi EmainA
vunnadA aMTE telugu sAmeta ceppinaTlu "oorukunnaMta uttmamoo
bODiguMDaMta sukhamoo lEdani" :). nEnoo adE cEddAmanukunnAnugAnee
EM ceyyaMaMTAru ceppaMDi "tirigEkAloo tiTTE nOroo voorukOvani" mA
bAmma ceppEdi. nAnOru mootapaDaTaM mahA kasthaMgA vuMdi.
Regards
-Madhava-
=3D-------=3D
PS: Thanks to SriVeluriRaogaru and Prabhakargaru for their discussions
on lAkshanikas. Your opinions are verymuch educative. I was awfully busy
with office work, I wanted to say somuch may be sometime during the
next week.