> I feel the discussion shifted from Telusa to saving SCIT.
>
> I feel saving SCIT is a secondary byproduct, and at this stage, even it is
> desirable, whether it will or not etc., are debatable points, and no one answer
> yes or no, other than their beliefs.
>
Central to my posts on this issue are my 'beliefs' that
a) attempting to save SCIT is a worthwhile endeavor,
b) that many, if not all, of the TELUSAers had come to TELUSA by way
of SCIT, and would like to see the revival of SCIT,
c) that this small group of people, working together can save SCIT, and
d) if they don't, there is no other 'organized' group out there that
will do it.
>... The question should be centered from Telusa point and not from SCIT
>point.
True as far as the question about pumping-in TELUSA articles to SCIT.
However, I think that this group has an interest in the question of
saving SCIT and ways to accomplish that can also be discussed here.
> One can try on an experimental basis to see if there is any tangible
> advantages that can come out it while waching any backlash.
>
> Discussions have so far outlined the advantages and disadvantages and we have to
> watch out and institute mechanics that could optimize the advantages and
> minimize the disadvantages.
>
I agree.
Regards. --- V. Chowdary Jampala