Re: posting by ROMPALLI V S N MURTY; preceded by a suggestion for TELUSA

Aravinda Pillalamarri (ap191@columbia.edu)
Tue, 26 Dec 1995 12:07:55 -0500 (EST)

Or we can just swamp s.c.i.t. with our postings. At least until a
moderated group is created, which will require votetaking and volunteers,
i.e. a long time. Whereas I think getting our messages automatically
copied to s.c.i.t. is fairly simple and may have immediate benefits.

-- Aravinda

On Tue, 26 Dec 1995, Ramana Juvvadi wrote:

>
> I have been thinking along the same lines too. One problem with SCIT
> is that it is unmoderated. That itself was not a problem for quite sometime
> until irrelevant posts started swamping out Telugu related postings.
>
> We can start another group soc.culture.telugu.moderated. We need
> some volunteers to be moderators on a rotation basis. I would like
> censoring to stop at weeding out the irrelevant posts. I am a little
> uncomfortable about trying to stop flames since it is difficult to
> draw a line between disgreements and flames. But if majority of the
> telusa netters have arguments for a spplying stricter censoring
> let us hear them.
>
> Ramana
>
>

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
"This law is a rag worthy of the dust
off the rebels' feet" -- Fahmida Riaz, "The Interrogator"
http://www.columbia.edu/~ap191
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~