There is a classical example for this at least to my knowledge. Once,
following a discussion about the blemishes in poetry, 'srI kRshnadevarAya'
semmed to have curiously asked his 'astadiggajAs' to tell a poem without a
fault. We do not know why, but finally, 'allasAni peddana' (probably, being
the senior most) set to fullfil the wish and came up with this poem
describing the king himself.
_____________________________________________________
SarasandhAna balA kshamAdi vividhaiSvaryammulan galgi, du
rbhara candatva bilapravESa calana brahmAghnatan mAninan,
narasimhA kshiti manDalESvarula nennan vaccu, nI sATigA!
narasimahA kshiti manDalESvarula kRshNA! rAja kanthIravA!
_____________________________________________________
tAtparyamu:
'sALva narasima rayala kumaruDaina, kRshNarAyA! rAja kanthIravA!
pEDitanamu lEkunnacO, goppa vilukADaina arjununi;
(talavanci) guhalO dUru dOshamulEnicO, mahA balaSAli simhamunu;
kampincuTa anu lOpamulEnicO, goppa Orpu gala bhoomini;
brahma hatyA dOshamu lEnicO, vividhaiSvaryamulu gala indruni;
nIku samAnamuga ceppavaccunu.'
As per the poem, there are beautiful 'kramAlankAra and SlEsha' s in it.
The first line describes all the great qualities of the four objects he has
chosen to compare with the king in a row. The second line describes all
the draw-backs of the same four objects respectively, in a row. The third
line brings into the picture all the four objects respectively, in a row.
The fourth line describes and addresses the king. With reference to the 3rd
and 4th lines, there is 'SlEsha'(different meanings for the same word/s.)
In the 3rd line, nara=arjuna; simha=simhamu; kshiti=bhoomi, mandDalESvara=
dikpAlakAdhipati-indruDu. However, the same 'narasimhA kshiti
manDalEsvarula' in the 4th line refers to'the king sALva narasimha
raya'-father of 'sree kRshNa devarAya'.
Coming to the 'aUcityabhangamu': Inspite of all this tremendous and
exceptional composition, the poet went back to address the king as 'rAja
kanthIravA! (rAja simhamA!), just after he himself mentioning that
--'guhalO dUruTa; simhapu goppadanamunaku lOpa'mani.
Afterall, finding a fault or making a comment is always easy, but not
creating or composing something. Is it? (Imagine, that too, to say that
extempore.)
Guess, who found it. You are right ! None other than the 'vikatakavi:
rAmakRshNa'; (Oh! No, not Pillalamarri). ( Do I have to say I am kidding;
it is implied, isn't it?)
P.S. Nasy Sankagiri gaari 'kunteesutamadhyamuNNi' #5 cEsi, deenini
'sAhityamlO aUcityam #6 andaamu. (Just for the sake of convenience and
nothingelse.)
With regards,
Prabhakar Vissavajjhala, Ph.D.
Fishberg Research Center for Neurobiology
Mt. Sinai School of Medicine
New York, NY 10029